Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1221

reference
533-tree-1
name
1221
tree-preservation-order

undefined

533-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023982 50.884441)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023911 50.884433,-1.023914 50.884447,-1.023924 50.884459,-1.023939 50.884470,-1.023959 50.884476,-1.023981 50.884479,-1.024003 50.884476,-1.024023 50.884470,-1.024039 50.884460,-1.024049 50.884448,-1.024053 50.884434,-1.024050 50.884420,-1.024040 50.884408,-1.024025 50.884398,-1.024005 50.884391,-1.023983 50.884389,-1.023961 50.884391,-1.023941 50.884397,-1.023925 50.884407,-1.023915 50.884419,-1.023911 50.884433)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL